The real question we should ask when choosing which Metro Auditor candidate to vote for is, not just who will check the books to see that no money went missing, but who is committed to that other form of auditing: performance auditing. (See here and here.)
Without performance audits, the Metro Auditor would only be doing half their job.
Which candidate has a history of overseeing performance audits?
Which candidate has a track record of collaboration with the other managers to improve business practices across an organization?
We don't need a "gotcha" auditor at Metro. We need a partner who will work with people at all levels to improve outcomes. That's a much tougher job.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment